Berkeley fined pounds 70,000 over pensions mis-selling review
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Personal Investment Authority, the financial regulator, signalled yesterday that it had lost patience over the slow pace of its pensions mis-selling review by fining one of its members more than pounds 70,000 for a series of compliance failures.
Berkeley Independent Advisers was also ordered to pay pounds 15,000 in costs after admitting the offences. The fine against Berkeley, a network of independent financial advisers (IFAs), is the largest to be levied by the PIA against its members.
It signals a new-found toughness by the PIA against its members following criticisms by MPs and consumer groups over its alleged failures to ensure swift compensation to victims of the pension transfer scandal.
A PIA spokesman said the fine followed a visit to the firm, based in Coventry, by the regulator's pensions review team in May 1996. The team found that Berkeley had failed to issue firms in its network with adequate instructions on how to identify pension cases that needed to be reviewed. It also failed to have proper procedures in place to monitor its advisers' conduct of the pensions review.
Hazel Hodge, head of marketing at Berkeley, said: "We have held our hands up and immediately rectified those areas in which we were at fault."
When the PIA was formed in 1994, independent financial advisers feared they might not be equipped to deal with tougher compliance requirements.
Thousands rushed to join IFA networks which provide technical assistance and deal with compliance issues.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments