Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Barings bondholders to sue

John Eisenhammer Financial Editor
Thursday 15 February 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JOHN EISENHAMMER

Financial Editor

Bondholders of Barings yesterday decided to sue the former top executives of the collapsed merchant bank and three prominent City houses in an effort to recover more than pounds 100m lost last year.

The directors to be named in the writs are Peter Baring, the former chairman, Andrew Tuckey, the former deputy chairman who is still working at Barings on a consultancy basis, and Peter Norris, the former head of investment banking. All three resigned last year shortly after Barings collapsed under nearly pounds 900m of losses run up by Nick Leeson in illicit derivatives speculation.

The City advisers are BZW Securities, Hoare Govett Securities of the ABN Amro group and Cazenove & Co, which participated in the January 1994 bond issue.

When ING, the Dutch bancassurer, bought Barings last year, it left out of the deal the Barings holding company that had issued the bonds, rendering them worthless. A large number of private investors, as well as several powerful institutions like Scottish Amicable and Legal & General, lost money.

"We are confident that proceedings will be issued as anticipated in early March," said Jonathan Stone, a lawyer leading the Barings Perpetual Noteholders Action Group. The writs will be aimed at recovering the original pounds 100m lost on the bonds, and a further pounds 9m in lost interest payments, as well as costs of litigation. The action group is represented by the solicitors SJ Berwin. BZW and Hoare Govett yesterday made no comment on the announcement of impending legal action.

Mr Stone said the legal action would be based on claims that the January 1994 bond prospectus put out by Barings plc and the managers, Hoare Govett, BZW, Cazenove and Baring Brothers & Co, was defective. "There are a number of issues in the document which give rise to considerable concern, and if it had not been defective, the bonds could not have been issued," Mr Stone said.

Ernst & Young, administrators to Barings Group, have issued writs against three firms of accountants alleging negligent auditing and claiming several millions of pounds. The firms involved are Coopers & Lybrand in London and Singapore and Deloitte Touche in Singapore. Ernst & Young have been collecting evidence since the collapse of the merchant bank in late February 1995.

Mr Baring, Mr Tuckey and Mr Norris have all been investigated, along with 20 other former executives fired by ING last year, by the City watchdog the Securities and Futures Authority. Some of the senior executives are expected to face disciplinary sanctions.

The bondholders said the decision to resort to legal action resulted from frustration at lack of progress in attempts to persuade ING to recognise the grievances of the investors.

According to Mr Stone, ING committed a serious error of judgement when it agreed shortly after purchasing Barings to honour the pounds 90m bonuses due staff for 1994, despite the fact that the merchant bank had been bankrupted. In view of this, ING should be willing to consider meeting the pounds 100m compensation claim, Mr Stone said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in