Banks and receivers plan Lords appeal over rescues
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRITAIN'S high-street banks and biggest firms of receivers are uniting to fund an appeal to the House of Lords to try to forestall millions of pounds worth of claims against them sparked off by the Paramount Airways case.
Roger Powdrill of Touche Ross, the administrator of Paramount Airways, yesterday confirmed that he had received leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal decision on 22 February that plunged Britain's company rescue specialists into crisis.
Last month Michael Heseltine, President of the Board of Trade, overturned the worst effects of the Appeal Court's recent decision on Paramount, which would have forced receivers to sack whole workforces within 14 days when they were sent in to rescue a company, but the Government decided that retrospective legislation would be unconstitutional.
This has left receivers, and the high-street banks that appoint them, with the threat of claims for millions of pounds from directors sacked between 1986 and the passing of Mr Heseltine's bill last month.
If a director of a failed company won such a claim, the receivers would have to reclaim the money from creditors to whom they had already made payouts - mainly the high-street banks.
The fear and uncertainty created by the Paramount decision has prompted many receivers to withhold funds that they would normally have paid straight over to creditors, mainly the banks, in case former employees might bring claims.
For instance, Ernst & Young, the former administrators of the Canary Wharf development in London's Docklands, are already facing a pounds 12m claim from three former directors of O&Y relating to severance terms in their employment contracts.
The appeal will probably be heard in October, and could cost pounds 200,000. Normally it would be funded from creditors' funds in the Paramount administration. But the groups decided that the threat to Britain's 'rescue culture' merits independent funding. The Society of Practitioners of Insolvency is co-ordinating the fund.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments