Auditors delay open hearings
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRITAIN'S largest accountancy body has delayed a decision on opening its disciplinary proceedings to the public.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales had been expected to reveal proposals for opening hearings to the public, but a preliminary report has raised a number of legal and ethical problems.
The institute may decide to opt for producing fuller reports of the results of the hearings instead. At the moment the reports give only the charges faced, the findings and the penalty.
Brian Harris, director of professional conduct, said that one concern was that other regulators, such as the Bank of England, the Department of Trade and Industry and Fimbra, the investment watchdog, might stop passing on information about accountants if such information ceased to be confidential.
The institute is also worried about the possibility of legal action over allegations made during the hearings, which could deter some complainants. Its hearings may carry legal immunity, but this will not be certain until a case is brought to court.
The institute also fears that members may not be able to defend themselves adequately - for example, by criticising superiors - if hearings are public.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments