Asset change to boost profits
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LONRHO'S profits this year will be boosted by a decision to reverse its practice of attaching a value to its newspapers, such as the Observer and the recently-sold Scottish titles, writes Gail Counsell.
The group, which began including newspapers as assets in 1988, said it was ending the practice because the basis on which such intangible assets were valued was 'extremely subjective' and the investment community tended to ignore them when making gearing and other calculations.
At the end of September 1991, Lonrho had pounds 131m of intangible assets, pounds 117m of which was the group's newspaper titles and pounds 14m development costs. By the interim stage disposals such as the pounds 45m sale of its Scottish weekly titles had reduced intangible assets to pounds 81m. Now the Observer remains as the only intangible still in the balance sheet. The valuation attached to it at present is unclear, although media analysts doubt that it would be significant, given that it is currently thought to be losing more than pounds 20m a year.
Accountants said yesterday that the change would mean any gain recorded on sales of intangibles would be increased by the amount by which the assets had previously been recorded in the balance sheet.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments