Angry paying names threaten legal action
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PETER RODGERS
Financial Editor
An angry group of Lloyd's names is on the point of taking the market to a judicial review if they do not win an improvement in the pounds 3.2bn rescue offer.
Solicitors representing the Paying Names Action Group wrote on Wednesday to Ron Sandler, chief executive of Lloyd's, setting out their objections to the deal and demanding a reply within seven days.
The paying names believe they are unfairly treated because the Lloyd's plan gives more recompense to members who have refused to pay their debts than to those who paid up on time.
In one notorious case, identical twins with identical investments in the market found that one brother is due to pay twice as much as the other. The one with the higher bill had paid his losses at Lloyd's and the other had held out.
Tony Welford, chairman of the action group, said he had 3,000 members, they had "deep pockets" and if Lloyd's refused to negotiate over a fair deal "we will go ahead with our legal action".
Mr Welford said it was "strongly arguable that Lloyd's has misconstrued its powers in relation to reconstruction and renewal. Litigation will be very regrettable. However, we are determined and I hope Lloyd's will give us an alternative."
The action group wants Lloyd's to agree greater parity between names who have paid and those who have not. The counsel advising the group, Richard Field, QC, has advised that it has a case to ask for a judicial review.
On Monday, Lloyd's won a resounding vote in favour of the first steps towards the rescue.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments