Andersen split revived
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Dissident partners at the international accounting and consulting firm Andersen Worldwide have revived plans to split the organisation into separate consulting and auditing companies after a second candidate for chief executive failed to secure election.
This weekend the Andersen Worldwide board, the umbrella organisation of Arthur Andersen, the auditors, and Andersen Consulting, are closeted in crisis meetings in an attempt to resolve the impasse over the future leadership of the organisation.
In 1996, the combined entity achieved record revenues of $9.5bn (pounds 5.7bn), but for the first time the $4.9bn contribution of Andersen Consulting outstripped that of its sister organisation.
The 2,700 partners last month rejected the board's recommended candidate, Jim Wadia, head of Arthur Andersen in the UK. And last week the second candidate, George Shaheen, from Andersen Consulting in the US, failed to get the two-thirds majority required to be elected chief executive.
The rumblings of discontent stem from the continuing frustration of the partners in Andersen Consulting at what they see as "foot-dragging" by the partners of Arthur Andersen over proposed reforms of the business structure.
Sources at Arthur Andersen said that had Mr Shaheen been elected, he would have instituted a change to the internal company structure that would have seen Andersen Consulting swallow the fledgling consulting arm of Arthur Andersen, and a long-term commitment to separate the partnership revenues.
This may have eventually led to the flotation of the consulting side to allow it to raise finance independently and compete in the expanding outsourcing market, which requires large sums of capital.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments