Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

...and is it BZW next?

Tom Stevenson Financial Editor
Monday 16 June 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The mounting problems at NatWest have focused attention on its high-street rivals and their different approaches to the volatile and so far relatively unrewarding area of investment banking. The evidence suggests sticking to unglamorous but predictable retail banking has been the better course, writes Tom Stevenson.

Lloyds TSB flirted with the idea of growing its own investment bank in the 1980s but took the view it would never be able to compete with the well-capitalised American players and withdrew. It has rewarded its investors with a 30 per cent return on capital and a share price that has doubled over the past year.

Barclays has shared NatWest's goal of becoming a meaningful global participant and has failed to make a better fist of it through BZW than its rival. Institutional investors in both companies have called for a withdrawal from investment banking and the redirection of the capital tied up in that business to the more steadily profitable high-street banking core.

Analysts believe NatWest has been more aggressive in its pursuit of its global ambitions. BZW has avoided the embarrassment of NatWest's heavy derivatives loss and has spent less than the pounds 1bn its rival has splashed out on acquisitions.

There is thought to be less pressure on Barclays because its other businesses are in better shape than NatWest's.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in