Allied Zurich hit by asbestos costs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ZURICH FINANCIAL Services, the Anglo-Swiss insurance giant formed out of the $18.7bn (pounds 11.6bn) merger between Zurich Insurance and BAT Industries' insurance operations last year, yesterday blamed the escalating costs of settling asbestos claims as it raised its estimate of the cost of integrating the businesses by $1bn to $2.4bn.
News of the higher charge caught the City unawares. Shares in Allied Zurich, the UK quoted arm of the group, fell 13p to 900p, while Zurich Allied fell Sfr25 to Sfr930.
Andrew Ritchie, insurance analyst at Fox-Pitt Kelton, said: "It is a nasty surprise." But he pointed out that, having taken the hit, the group is unlikely to have to do so again.
The bulk of yesterday's increased merger charge - about $800m - is a result of the new management's decision to set aside further reserves at Eagle Star, the UK general insurer, to cover potential asbestos and pollution-related claims following costly settlements in the UK and US over the past year.
That is on top of the $750m that was added to Eagle Star reserves when the merger was announced, reflecting the more conservative Swiss provisioning policy. The move has doubled non-life technical reserves to $1.6bn. Most of the claims' exposures have durations of 20 years or more.
As with most UK insurers, Eagle Star had been less conservative about provisioning than European competitors.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments