Allied spurns Punch to back Whitbread offer
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
THE BOARD of Allied Domecq yesterday backed Whitbread's pounds 2.877bn bid for its 3,600 pub estate in preference to the pounds 2.925bn rival offer from Punch Taverns .
Allied directors argued that Whitbread offered shareholders greater certainty and safety.
Analysts and investors said there was little to choose between the bids and agreed that timing and issues relating to the exclusivity agreement between Allied and Whitbread were at the heart of the unanimous recommendation.
Hugh Osmond, the chairman of Punch, claimed the issue hinged on the Allied board's fear that it would break the exclusivity agreement with Whitbread and risk legal action if it recommended the Punch bid. "It's not about value," he said.
Shareholders, who will be sent the terms of both offers, will be invited to a specially convened EGM on 23 July to decide which bid they prefer.
However, Mr Osmond did not rule out the possibility of another offer before then while David Thomas, the chief executive of Whitbread, said he expected Punch to make another bid.
Mr Thomas said: "I would anticipate they will do everything in their power to increase their offer. That would be in the nature of the consortium and the way they've behaved to date."
Mr Osmond said: "I wouldn't say we're actively considering it but I wouldn't rule it out. If shareholders want to see a restructured offer, we would listen."
An analyst said: "Punch may increase its bid. The difference between the two is minimal at the moment. It's quite possible the difference in warranties makes the Whitbread one the safest at the moment."
Punch spent the day yesterday suggesting that acceptance of the Whitbread offer against the trend of the market was the result of the "old boys club of the beerage" and claimed that issues of corporate governance were at stake.
However, sources indicated that the board's decision had more to do with Philip Bowman, the chairman of Allied, persuading Sir Christopher Hogg, the chief executive, to back Whitbread.
Mr Thomas emphasised that certainty was behind the recommendation for Whitbread. "They know what they get when they sell to Whitbread."
Outlook, page 19
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments