Alliance poised to outbid Abbey
Building Societies Conference 1995
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Alliance & Leicester Building Society is set to make a bid for National & Provincial, possibly for as much as pounds 1.6bn, in an attempt to wrest it from Abbey National, which is poised to make an offer of pounds 1.1bn for N&P tomorrow.
Sources at the Building Societies Association's annual conference in Birmingham indicated that Alliance & Leicester has emerged as the strongest contender to defend N&P against what is perceived as Abbey National's hostile approach.
The Abbey bid promises members of N&P cash averaging pounds 650 each, while an Alliance & Leicester offer at pounds 1.6bn would be worth considerably more. A problem with the Alliance & Leicester's bid is that its proposal to merge with the N&P and then convert to bank status would take up to three years, whereas the Abbey merger would give N&P members cash payments within a year.
The BSA conference has focused anti-bank sentiments among the building societies, which see themselves as victims of a "duck shoot" by the banks following Lloyds Bank's successful acquisition of Cheltenham & Gloucester.
Many building society figures were annoyed that N&P has not been more vocal in its criticism of Abbey National's unsolicited approach.
John Wriglesworth, a director of Bradford & Bingley, said: "I am surprised at the weakness of the N&P defence against what is blatantly an attempt to cheat the appropriate system of making a bid, and attempting to go to the members of N&P with a cheap bribe. N&P should be more aggressive."
Alliance & Leicester, under chief executive Peter White, is seen by rival societies as a good fit with N&P.
Alliance & Leicester is strong in the south of England and already owns the Giro Bank, making it well-suited to conversion to a bank. N&P on the other hand is strong in the North and owns a life assurance company. Rival societies, which are championing the cause of mutuality against the rising tide of conversions to plc status, see Alliance & Leicester as "sitting on the fence" on the subject of mutuality. They expect it to seek a merger and conversion soon, whether or not it wins N&P.
Abbey National's pounds 1.1bn bid for National & Provincial represents roughly 1.5 times N&P's net asset value. Societies at the conference attacked this as being too low. Lloyds Bank paid pounds 1.8bn for Cheltenham & Gloucester, representing 1.8 times net asset value. However, analysts point out C&G was a low-cost producer of mortgages with relatively few branches for a building society.
Another reason for N&P to prefer the Alliance & Leicester approach is the suggestion that Abbey would sack all N&P's directors if it won the auction. Abbey has said nothing publicly either about the size of its bid or what it would do with N&P, other than saying it would pay "a significant premium to net asset value".
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments