Alarm at decisions on auditors' insurance
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SHAREHOLDER groups including the Association of British Insurers are opposing moves by companies that will enable them to buy professional indemnity cover for their own auditors, writes John Willcock.
The move conjures up the prospect of shareholders buying indemnity cover for auditors whom they may sue for negligence. Vaux Group, the brewer, altered its articles of association in January to enable it to buy such cover for its auditors, Price Waterhouse. Vaux stressed that it had no immediate plans to use the powers.
The move comes as costs for professional indemnity cover have rocketed because of huge negligence claims, often brought by shareholders. Unilever and Rugby Group plan to pass similar resolutions at their annual meetings on 4 and 6 May, with more companies in the pipeline.
Richard Regan, head of investment affairs at the ABI, said: 'It is desirable that companies should offer PI cover for their directors and officers, but it must be appropriate that the auditors provide their own.'
Stuart Bell, research director with PIRC, a consultancy advising local authority pension funds, said: 'If auditors are to be indemnified by companies they may exercise less care, be less rigorous, and be less independent when examining the directors' accounts.'
A spokesman for Unilever insisted the proposed amendment is was nothing out of the ordinary. 'We believe it is good management to have the utmost flexibility under our statutes.'
View from City Road, page 32
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments