Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Accountants in 'hypocrisy' revolt

Paul Rodgers
Saturday 22 June 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales has been blasted for hypocrisy after advocating rights for shareholders that it denies to its own members.

The ICA warned that on current trends, shareholder revolts - such as the one against former British Gas boss Cedric Brown's 75 per cent pay rise, where demonstrators paraded a sow named Cedric - could fizzle out.

To counter the drift away from corporate democracy companies should be required to circulate shareholder resolutions at no cost to the proposers, it said in a memorandum to the Department of Trade and Industry last week.

Yet a resolution calling for direct election of its own executive was shot down in flames earlier this month after the ICA refused to circulate proxy forms among its members.

"It's one law for others and a different one for themselves," said dissident accountant Jeff Wooller. "For the Institute to make these proposals is downright hypocritical."

ICA executives were not available to comment, but a spokeswoman said she did not think the stances were comparable.

In the memorandum, the institute said: "While we are not aware of any cases where requisitionists have been prevented or deterred from having a resolution circulated, this does not mean that such cases have not occurred."

The ICA made its recommendations in response to a DTI consultation document.

It fretted that because shares held in nominee accounts are all deemed to be owned by the stockbroker, and not the individuals it represents, Sids are denied the right to go to annual general meetings.

Mr Wooller also complained that the Institute is hypocritical with regard to the rules of good corporate governance. The Greenbury Committee on Top Pay recommended greater disclosure of executives' benefits packages in annual reports.

But accountants still do not know how much the bosses of their own professional organisation receive.

"The Institute should be a leader in the field of openness," he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in