Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

A few angry borrowers may scotch merger

Clifford German
Sunday 26 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AS FEW as 50,000 truculent borrowers could still defeat the proposed merger of the Cheltenham & Gloucester Building Society with Lloyds Bank next month.

The 1.2 million members should by now have received their voting forms for next month's postal ballot to decide whether to let their society sell out to Lloyds Bank.

The 806,000 customers with deposit accounts with the society will be offered a cash sweetener of 13 per cent of their balance plus £500, which works out at £513 on a minimum qualifying balance of £100 and £13,500 on a maximum stake of £100,000, to help them decide.

But the 384,000 customers who have borrowed from the society are not being offered anything, on the grounds that it would be illegal to offer them money.

To succeed in getting the merger approved, the C&G management, which favours the link with Lloyds, needs to obtain the approval of 50 per cent of the borrowers who vote, and 75 per cent of the investing members who vote. In the latter case, at least 50 per cent of those eligible must vote.

To be eligible, an investor must be the sole or first-named holder of a share account and have held an account continuously from 1 January 1993 until voting day. Perhaps 700,000 investors will meet these qualifications. In other words, the management needs to win the votes of around 350,000 investing members regardless. If there is significant opposition, it could need more than 350,000 to secure the 75 per cent majority.

However, a simple majority of borrowers with existing mortgages on the day of the vote must also vote in favour. As things stand, many borrowers may decide to vote no in the hope that rulings may change and a future merger plan could reward them. In theory, a tiny number of disgruntled borrowers could defeat the whole motion by voting against the merger in a low poll.

But the management's trump card is the 10 per cent of borrowers who are also investors. They have two votes, and many may decide to approve as borrowers to ensure that they at least get the cash as investors.

Investors have been sent a blue voting form, borrowers a green form. To cast a valid vote, borrowers must use black ink to sign their ballot form and indicate with a cross which way they want to vote. Signed forms without a cross will be taken as proxy votes for the chairman to vote as he thinks fit, and he will use your vote in favour of the merger.

Votes must be posted back to arrive before midnight on 26 March, in good time for the public meeting on 31 March at the London Arena, where members can vote in person if they prefer.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in