Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

A deal too far for Jarvis?

Edited Peter Thal Larsen
Wednesday 24 June 1998 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

HAVE WE seen the best of Jarvis? The fast-growing transport infrastructure and facilities management group has been one of the market's favourite stocks in recent years. But in the past few weeks investors have slammed on the brakes, and yesterday the shares dropped another 30.5p to 716p.

This despite impressive full-year figures which showed pretax profits more than doubling to pounds 36.7m on turnover up 36 per cent to pounds 355m. Even the news that Jarvis is the preferred bidder on a range of contracts worth a combined pounds 300m failed to boost the shares.

This is partly just profit-taking. After all, Jarvis shares have risen more than 30-fold since the beginning of 1996. But the concerns run deeper. Specifically, shareholders worry that Jarvis may have done a deal too far in buying Streamline, the quoted road services business, for pounds 185m in May.

Paris Moayedi, Jarvis's chief executive, argues that it makes sense to branch out into roads and airports. But sceptics point out that in rail Jarvis is dealing with a private-sector customer while in roads it depends on the government. The government's dislike of road travel hardly bodes well.

Moreover, Jarvis will not be able to repeat the trick it managed last year with Fastline and Relayfast, the track renewal companies, in buying underperforming assets and turning them around. Instead, Jarvis paid a full price for a company which was already very profitable.

Brokers expect profits of pounds 57m in the coming year, putting the shares on a forward p/e ratio of 23. Given the uncertainty, the shares are still overvalued.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in