$16m for AT&T boss as 40,000 jobs are cut
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DAVID USBORNE
New York
Just weeks after AT&T announced plans to shed 40,000 workers, it has emerged that its chief executive, Robert Allen, received a pay package in 1995 valued at just over $16m, compared with $6.7m a year earlier.
The revelation is certain to appal AT&T's already beleaguered workforce and deepen the widespread bad publicity that has been afflicting the company ever since it took the original job-cutting decision. It was already a favourite target of caustic comment on the presidential election trail.
Mr Allen has been forced to defend himself, most notably in an ill-humoured memo to staff circulated on Tuesday in which he contended that his pay package was "in line with CEOs of comparable corporations".
The core of Mr Allen's 1995 package was some $5.2m in salary, bonuses and stock. In addition, however, he received 750,000 stock options to buy AT&T shares at today's price beginning in 1999 - options which, according to AT&T, have a value of $10.8m.
In his memo, Mr Allen accused the US media of waging a "relentless" and "inaccurate" smear campaign against AT&T since the unveiling of the job cuts last month.
He insisted: "Restructuring to get to a strong future does unfortunately require force reductions. I'm not immune to the emotions they engender. I'm deeply saddened by the pain and loss this is causing some of our people and their families. But in the end, concern is not enough."
Many within AT&T believe that the job reductions were the result of a litany of bad management decisions, most notable among them the 1990 purchase of the NCR computer company which proved disastrous.
Analysts also question whether Mr Allen should even be retained as chief executive, let alone generously rewarded.
Separately, meanwhile, it also surfaced yesterday that the chief executive officer of GAP, the clothing company, Millard Drexler, sold 1.3 million of his company shares earlier this month, pocketing a personal profit of $64.6m.
Unlike AT&T, GAP continues to flourish. Earlier this week, the company announced it was increasing dividend payments by 25 per cent and splitting its shares 2-for-1.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments