Bulger sentence 'justified'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Home Secretary, Michael Howard, acted "well within his discretion" when he decided that the schoolboy killers of James Bulger should be detained for at least 15 years, the High Court was told yesterday.
David Pannick QC, for the minister, said he had been "well justified" in using his discretionary powers to increase the minimum sentence after concluding that the two-year-old's murder was an "exceptionally cruel, sadistic offence."
Mr Howard is accused of misusing those powers by imposing a "tariff" for retribution Jon Venables and Robert Thompson, who were both 10 when they kidnapped and murdered James, two, in Bootle, Merseyside, in 1993.
Their lawyers were applying for judicial review of the case.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments