Broadcasting: ITC upholds complaints on monarchy debate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Independent Television Commission has partly backed viewers' complaints concerning ITV's debate on the future of the monarchy. Screened in January, it involved 3,000 people at Birmingham's National Exhibition Centre and thousands more in a telephone poll. It sparked a storm of criticism, including 85 official complaints. The ITC said that, while the programme had been impartial, constituted a proper subject for television and was a distinctive new format, it "could not be regarded as a programme of high quality".
It agreed with many complainants that the audience had at times seemed out of control, that there had been a lack of scope for the development of arguments - due to the very rapid changeover and quantity of panelists - and that technical problems had overloaded the telephone voting system.The programme's maker, Carlton, said it was "puzzled" by the ITC's position.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments