Britain bars all Nigerian refugees
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ALL 2000 Nigerians who sought asylum in Britain last year had their applications rejected by the Home Office. The effective ban on Nigerian refugees stayed even after Nigeria's military dictatorship sparked worldwide disgust by executing Ken Saro-Wiwa, the human rights activist.
A sustained critique of Michael Howard's claims that Britain is being overrun by "bogus" asylum seekers, to be published tomorrow, shows that the treatment of Nigerians was not an isolated example.
Asylum-seekers from country after country with histories of oppression were turned away by Britain.
The report by the Refugee Council, the leading body promoting asylum- seekers' rights, found that all Rwandans whose cases were heard in 1995 had their claims for refugee status rejected and 91 per cent of Sri Lankans were told they were not welcome.
The anti-Nigerian policy did not change after Mr Saro-Wiwa's death in November. Of the 720 asylum seekers whose cases were decided after the execution, all were refused refugee status and just two were allowed to stay in Britain provisionally.
The Council's 70-page examination of the "myth" of bogus refugees is to be sent to peers who will next month debate Mr Howard's Asylum Bill, which aims to make it even harder to find sanctuary in Britain.
Nick Hardwick, the Council's chief executive, attacked both the Home Secretary and conservative newspapers for pretending refugees were simply greedy immigrants looking for hand-outs.
"The UK is anything but a soft touch for asylum seekers," said Hardwick. "They are welcomed not with a humanitarian response but with suspicion and a presumption of guilt."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments