Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Breast removed after lab mix-up

Jeremy Laurance
Wednesday 24 March 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A WOMAN who had a healthy breast removed after being told mistakenly that she had cancer was the victim of a mix-up of slides in a laboratory, a hospital said yesterday.

Anita Froggatt agreed to undergo the mastectomy at the Chesterfield Royal Hospital after analysis of a lump removed from her right breast apparently showed it was malignant. Two weeks later it emerged that the slide with her healthy breast tissue had been confused with the slide of another woman, who had cancer.

Yesterday the hospital said it took full responsibility for the error and that it was investigating how it had happened. A member of the laboratory staff has been suspended on full pay.

Christopher Day, medical director, said: "We acted immediately and saw the patient as soon as this error came to light. It is a tragic situation and we take full responsibility. We have given her a frank explanation of events and, of course, a full apology."

Mrs Froggatt, 28, who has a 10-year-old son, told The Mirror that she was still too shocked by the news of the unnecessary operation to be angry. She said: "I can never forgive them for this. They have robbed me of my womanhood. It's unthinkable what they've done to me, and it's all for nothing."

She added: "It's unbelievable how one lab technician's work can sail through as gospel without being checked and checked again before such drastic surgery. It beggars belief. You trust the NHS. You believe what you're told."

She has lost her factory job since the operation, which included removal of the lymph nodes in her armpit, because movement of her arm is now restricted.

The hospital said that it would not contest a claim for compensation, which some estimates have put as high as pounds 500,000.

Phil Bowen, a solicitor who is representing Mrs Froggatt, said: "In many years of dealing with medical negligence claims, this is undoubtedly the most appalling case that I have experienced.

"The distress which has been caused to Anita is unimaginable. To even begin to recover from this traumatic experience my client will require counselling and reconstructive surgery." He added: "Both Anita and myself would wish to make it clear that this is an unusual mistake and neither of us would wish this to affect the use of the breast screening service by any woman who discovers a lump in her breast."

In the past, patients have had limbs wrongly amputated but greater precautions are now taken and these errors have been eliminated. In the early 1990s, healthy patients in Birmingham were wrongly diagnosed with bone cancer and underwent chemotherapy as a result of errors by a pathologist in reading tissue samples. But breast cancer charities said yesterday that they had not heard of slides being mixed up in a laboratory before. A spokeswoman for Breast Cancer Care said: "It is absolutely horrifying. With today's health care and the screening available, nothing should go wrong."

The hospital said that the other woman in the mix-up had received the correct treatment because her slide was not misread.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in