Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Breakthrough in fight against Alzheimer's

Charles Arthur
Thursday 14 March 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CHARLES ARTHUR

Science Correspondent

New research into Alzheimer's disease may offer possible methods of preventing the degenerative brain disorder from developing.

The work suggests that neurons in the brain are killed off when blood vessels constrict due to the presence of highly reactive "free radical" molecules in the blood.

But the finding has also pointed up a weakness in Britain's science base. A key part of the research was carried out by Mike Mullan, a British scientist now working at the University of South Florida in the US. In 1991 he was one of a six-strong team based at St Mary's Hospital, London, who made a breakthrough by identifying a genetic link for Alzheimer's. However, that team has dissolved, with three of the scientists emigrating to the US and another to France. Only one of the original group is now left at the hospital.

The latest findings, published today in the scientific journal Nature, are based around the effects of an insoluble protein called -amyloid, which is found in the blood and particularly as deposits in the brains of people suffering from Alzheimer's.

-amyloid appears to react with cells in the walls of blood vessels in the brain to create "free radical" oxygen molecules. These are oxygen molecules that have lost an electron in a biochemical reaction and so are highly reactive. The free radicals appear to prompt the constriction of blood vessels which serve the neurons in the brain - leading, suggest the researchers, to the neurons' eventual dysfunction and death.

This leads them to suggest that Alzheimer's might be prevented - though not cured - by the provision of so-called "anti-oxidants", which are enzymes, and other chemicals which effectively neutralise free radicals by "mopping them up".

Other scientists gave a cautious welcome to the work. Jonathan Stamler, of Duke University Medical Centre in the US, said the work still had to be confirmed in humans: the latest work was only carried out on rats. He also queried the short timescale over which the free radicals affect blood vessels, compared with the decades over which Alzheimer's seems to take effect.

Simon Lovestone, of the Institute of Psychiatry in London, said "The idea that free radicals were a factor remained unproven for years. This is very interesting." Professor Mullan said yesterday: "The problem is to find an experimental means of testing our ideas fully. But it does open up new ways to deal with Alzheimer's."

He did not regret emigrating to the US. "After our work in 1991, the team was looking for more resources. The British offers might have meant we could have achieved the same, but it would have taken longer. I'm not sure it would have happened."

John Mulvey, of the pressure group Save British Science, commented that many researchers were put off by the facilities in Britain: The economy loses a competitive edge by not being able to keep its most promising talent, he said.

Brain strain, Section Two

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in