Boeing says alleged cause of fatal crash is impossible
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE US aviation authorities and the Boeing aircraft company were both aware of a potential engine fault that may have caused the Pittsburgh air crash last Friday in which all 132 passengers and crew were killed, according to a report by a US television network.
The main theory being tested by investigators is that the thrust reverser was accidentally or automatically deployed, causing the Boeing 737-300 to crash seven miles from the airport. In May 1991, a Lauda Air Boeing 767 crashed shortly after take-off in Thailand, killing all 223 people on board. That crash was found to have been caused by a computer malfunction which put one engine into reverse. The reverse thrust should be deployed only to help braking after an aircraft lands; deployment during flight is supposed to be impossible.
ABC News said that both the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Boeing were aware of a potential fault on the aircraft with the thrust reversers. USAir had begun modifications on the 737 that crashed last week, but stopped because the new design was not correct. Boeing issued another design in July, but the FAA has not made the modifications mandatory.
Investigators have still not determined conclusively whether the engagement of the thrust reverser was the cause of the crash. They found that half the reverse mechanism on one engine may have been activated, but Boeing says that partial activation is impossible. Two other possible causes might be that the engine came loose, or that the brakes were unevenly deployed. 'We want to examine everything that might have caused the right wing to rise,' a spokesman said.
National Transportation Safety Board investigators are to stage a simulation of in-flight deployment of thrust reversers in an effort to determine the cause. The simulation will then be compared with the flight data-recorder and other information about the aircraft's final turn and its fall from 6,000 feet.
Boeing said last night that the Boeing 737 - of which 2,641 have been delivered, making it the world's most popular commercial airliner - had a safety record well above average, but refused to comment on the likely cause of the crash. Several British airlines including British Airways, British Midland, and Air UK fly Boeing 737s.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments