Black job-seeker loses racial bias battle against M&S
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A fashion buyer yesterday finally lost a six-year battle with Marks & Spencer, the high street giant she accused of refusing her a job because of racial bias.
Adelle Martins, 31, who is black, first complained to an industrial tribunal after she was turned down for a job in January 1992. The tribunal ruled that there had been discrimination and awarded her pounds 3,000 for injury to her feelings and gave her leave to apply for compensation for other losses.
The panel said that she did not get the job because of her ethnic origins and that although Marks & Spencer had taken steps to counter the perception of it as "a white, middle-class organisation", they had had little effect on the staff's ethnic mix. The company took the case to an employment appeals tribunal, which found in May last year that the the company had taken "reasonable" steps to eliminate racial discrimination.
Ms Martins, of Wandsworth, south London, went to the Court of Appeal, which yesterday upheld the findings of the employment appeals tribunal. Lord Justice Mummery said the approach of the industrial tribunal was "defective", substituting its own favourable assessment of Ms Martins based on its own observations of her at the tribunal, for that of the Marks & Spencer interviewers. "That is an unsound basis for a finding of less favourable treatment or for a legitimate inference of discrimination on the ground of race."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments