Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bill makes press bugs legal

Stephen Fay
Sunday 02 February 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Home Office minister Baroness Blatch has confirmed that the Government's Police Bill will legitimise the bugging of newspaper offices.

Unless amended in the House of Commons, the Bill's powers could be used to spy on newspapers investigating a case like Spycatcher, the autobiography of the former MI5 agent Peter Wright which the Government tried to prevent newspapers from publishing.

Lord Lester, a Liberal Democrat civil rights specialist, says that when journalists' contacts fear that their conversations may be bugged, the Bill may have "a chilling effect on free speech".

The Bill gives chief constables the power to bug offices when "serious crime" is suspected. After the debate on the Bill in the Lords, Lord Lester wrote to Baroness Blatch asking if the definition serious crime "was wide enough to cover the case of a newspaper suspected of committing breaches of the Official Secrets Act or the Contempt of Court Act with a whistleblower or public interest defence"

Lady Blatch denied the Bill was drafted with any particular offence in mind, but that its wording would cover Official Secrets and Contempt - crimes of a political character, according to Lord Lester. He proposes that three of the "Gang of Four" - Lords Rogers, Jenkins and Baroness Williams - should attack the Government before the Bill is debated in the Commons.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in