Benefits Agency to end freephone advice service
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Benefits Agency is to end its freephone advice service from 12 July - saving pounds 6.5m. Some 3 million calls a year are made on the "Freeline", but an agency review found that many customers had then to be referred to their local benefits office to pursue the inquiry. Last March, the Independent disclosed the plan to scrap the Freeline as part of a pounds 200m programme of social security cuts.
In a written Commons announcement, Roger Evans, Under Secretary for Social Security, said the money saved would go into the delivery of benefits. However the Child Poverty Action Group said it was already difficult for people to get information about benefits. Group director Sally Witcher, said: "There is a risk that fewer people will get the benefits they need."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments