AP PHOTOS: COVID-19 tests at Olympics not just for people
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It’s not just people inside Beijing’s Olympic bubble who are getting tested for COVID-19. Workers in hazmat suits are also swabbing door handles, elevator buttons, couches and ATM machines, though health experts say surfaces pose little risk for spreading the virus.
It’s all part of the elaborate protocols to prevent the spread of the virus at the Games that also include limiting the movement of athletes and others to dedicated Olympic locations and daily testing for everyone inside that “closed loop" of sites.
The sight of workers testing surfaces might be surprising for many international visitors, since health experts say the virus spreads mainly through the air when infected people talk, cough or sneeze. They note the virus can't survive or multiply on surfaces.
Still, Deb Fuller, a virus expert at the University of Washington says the testing could be another way to determine if the virus is getting the bubble. She notes studies have shown that traces of dead virus can linger in rooms where infected people have stayed.
“They may be testing the surfaces as a marker for whether virus was in the air recently,” she said.
If that’s the case, she notes the limitations of the testing. A positive result might indicate where infected people might've been. But negative results couldn't rule out the possibility, since workers could have just missed the spot that got sneezed or coughed on.
Alternately, Fuller says the testing could be for show or habit, with some places still being more cautious about spread from surfaces.