Beef law not being enforced
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Environmental health officers say that the "beef-on-the-bone" ban introduced almost a month ago is "practically unworkable" and that they are pushing it far down their list of priorities.
"To catch anyone selling beef on the bone illegally officers would need to go undercover, which is costly and time- consuming," said a spokesman for the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health Officers (IEHO). Members of the institute added that the legislation implementing the ban is too badly drafted to be effective.
Jack Cunningham, the Agriculture Minister, hinted yesterday that the ban could eventually be lifted - once BSE has been eradicated from the national herd, which experts expect will take at least until the next century.
The ban on beef-on-the-bone was introduced because scientists from Seac, the committee advising the government on BSE and related diseases, found that the roots of nerves near the spinal column can harbour the infective agent, which can be fatally infective to humans by causing "new variant" Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Though this only applied to spinal bones, Dr Cunningham declared a ban on any sales of beef-on the-bone, because people might be at risk. Statistical analysis suggested the risk is real, but vanishingly small.
A spokesman for the IEHO said that given the confusion and the low risk involved to consumers from eating beef-on-the-bone, it was understandable that inspectors were putting it way down their list of enforcement.
"It's unclear exactly what the situation is in each area in terms of the action being taken," he said. "The law is extremely badly drafted. The Government hasn't given us written clarification of the law." He added that local authorities, having limited resources, are pushing the ban's enforcement far down their lists of priorities.
Michael Jack, shadow agriculture spokesman, said: "Jack Cunningham has managed to introduce a piece of legislation which is unworkable, unnecessary and unwanted ... He should have left it to the good sense of the British people to decide if they wanted to eat beef-on-the-bone, and not played the role of the nanny."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments