Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

BBC backs its royal coverage

Tom Pettifor
Saturday 12 February 2005 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE BBC last night defended its coverage of the engagement of the Prince of Wales and Camilla Parker Bowles after receiving calls complaining that too much airtime was devoted to the story.

Scores of listeners and viewers e-mailed and phoned in, with one accusing journalists of being "on the verge of hysteria".

Programmes such as BBC1's news at 6pm and The World at One on Radio 4 were attacked for devoting too much time to Thursday's announcement at the expense of other world stories. Simon Whomsley, a viewer, said: "Camilla and Charles to marry; Pope returns home; North Korea has confirmed it has nuclear weapons. This is the order the news was presented tonight! Absolutely amazing." Dozens complained after Wildlife On One was dropped in favour of the BBC News Special: Charles and Camilla on BBC1.

A spokesman for the BBC said: "We recognise that not all viewers are interested in stories relating to the Royal Family, but equally there is a significant audience who do wish to be informed of such decisions."

Howard Jacobson, page 40

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in