BBC art expert cheated out of pounds 200,000 by his best friend
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A fine arts expert from BBC TV's Antiques Roadshow was yesterday awarded more than pounds 200,000 in unpaid commission over the sale of an oil sketch by Constable, cheated from him by his best friend of 20 years.
Judge Prosser said Peter Nahum had suffered the "blatant lying and devious actions" of dealer Alan Hobart, during the pounds 6.7m sale of View on the Stour by Royal Holloway and Bedford New College in 1993.
The judge said the reason Mr Nahum was never paid his commission by Royal Holloway, part of the University of London, was because of a "veneer of deceit" by Mr Hobart, who represented the eventual buyer of the painting, Sir Graham Kirkham.
Mr Nahum had an oral agreement with the college to find buyers for three paintings which were to be sold to raise money for restoration work. The first, a Turner was sold independently for pounds 11m. Mr Nahum then introduced Sir Graham to the college as a potential buyer of a Gainsborough, Peasants Going to Market, which sold for pounds 3.5m, and he was paid an agreed commission of pounds 100,000.
Even though Mr Hobart had repeatedly told Mr Nahum that his client was not interested in it, Sir Graham went on to buy the Constable. Judge Prosser said Mr Hobart had told the college this was "a completely separate deal", so there was no need to use Mr Nahum.
When Mr Nahum eventually discovered the buyer's identity, he invoiced the college for pounds 196,812 commission, which it refused to pay, saying he had had nothing to do with the sale.
Mr Hobart had explained Sir Graham's change of mind by saying that he had seen the Constable again at the Tate Gallery and because the light was better, had decided to buy it.
But Judge Prosser said he "had no hesitation" in believing Mr Nahum's version of events. "I had a strong feeling throughout that Mr Nahum was an honest man, a straight-dealing and honourable man. I would not rely on Mr Hobart's word for anything in this case."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments