Barristers face fee inquiry
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE House of Lords is set to hold the first ever inquiry into the size of barristers' criminal legal aid fees after a senior official took the unprecedented step of refusing to authorise payments of four leading QCs.
The four include prominent left-wing barrister Michael Mansfield, a leading campaigner over miscarraiges of justice and a regular media pundit
The clerk to the Parliaments, Michael Davies, is said to have refused to allow the payments because he believed they were too high. This was after three of the four had already been cut, in some cases by almost half, by another official.
Fees in the fourth case are expected not to be sanctioned, though the process has not been completed.
Mr Mansfield, and the other three - Christopher Sallon, Peter Feinberg and Richard Henriques - are believed to have instructed a fellow QC, James Munby, to defend the amounts they claimed for appeals in the House of Lords last year.
The importance attached to the case by the Bar Council is reflected in the choice of Sydney Kentridge, QC, the most sought-after advocate at the Bar, to represent the profession.
The result of the inquiry, which will be held before five law lords on June 17 and 18, could be a dramatic drop in QC's earnings. Currently top silks earn around pounds 300,000 annually but payments could be brought into line with other professionals paid from public funds.
Mr Henriques earned the most out of all QC's from legal aid in 1995-96 with more than pounds 500,000 - although he later said that related to more than one year. Mr Feinberg was in the 1996-97 top 20 with earnings between pounds 350,000 and pounds 399,000.
At the inquiry, Law Lords will decide for the first time whether barristers' legal fees should be linked to a comparable sum for private work or whether it ought to be based on an income for a public service professional with comparable skills to a lawyer.
The obvious comparison would be with hospital consultants, who earn a maximum of around pounds 110,000.
The Law Lords will have to take into account the fact that since barristers are self-employed they have to pay chambers expenses and make their own pension provisions. This would would lead to a maximum figure of around pounds 175,000 for a QC's annual salary.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments