Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ban worsens UK relations with Brussels

Katherine Butler Brussels
Tuesday 26 March 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

KATHERINE BUTLER

Brussels

Britain's European partners yesterday formally closed the door on British beef and imposed an indefinite ban effective throughout the fifteen member states.

The trade boycott, which the EU agriculture commissioner, Franz Fischler, said would extend to exports of British beef and cattle to non-EU countries, was agreed by chief veterinary officers who outvoted Britain by fourteen to one. It will not affect meat on sale in British shops however.

The move confirms decisions by all but two of the EU countries to close their borders to British beef and cattle. The move yesterday provoked a furious response from John Major who urged Jacques Santer, president of the European Commission, to reconvene the meeting to hear evidence from British officials. Mr Santer agreed the meeting would reconvene today but the decision yesterday threatens to plunge already tense relations between the UK and its European Union partners into crisis.

Britain's chief vet, Keith Meldrum, who argued vehemently against the ban, emerged from the day-long meeting to accuse his European colleagues of ignoring the advice of scientists.

"The proposal was rushed, unscientific and disproportionate," he said. "I am concerned that not enough time was given to this. The proposal is not properly scientifically based."

Mr Meldrum stressed that neither British nor European scientists had recommended such action. Furious British officials - who described the move as "ramshackle, hasty, ill thought out and having no basis in science" - said the ban also extended to cattle semen and embryos which even the European Commission acknowledged harboured no risk.

Other representatives said the atmosphere had been acrimonious "There was a lot of strong feeling against Britain" said one.

Anger in Brussels at the British government's handling of the crisis erupted earlier. In a letter to the agriculture minister Douglas Hogg, Mr Fischler, accused the government of failing to keep it informed. He suggested that London had triggered an unnecessary Europe-wide beef collapse.

If the problem was as serious as it sounded, he wrote, then the measures announced by London appeared inadequate. If, on the other hand the new evidence added little to the existing body of knowledge on the possible link between BSE and CJD "a more careful reaction would have been preferable".

A spokesman confirmed that no inkling had been conveyed to Britain's EU partners or the Commission during a meeting of the 15 agriculture ministers last Monday.

There was a strong feeling, senior officials said, that London was not being as forthcoming with Brussels as it ought particularly in light of the government's demands for substantial sums of aid.

Mr Fischler said any claims for compensation from Brussels would have to be scientifically based.

The commissioner suggested that if beef prices fell through the floor in Britain Brussels would open the doors of "intervention", the CAP's system for propping up prices.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in