Attempt to halt tobacco funding
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A leading cancer charity is to mount a campaign to prevent tobacco companies gaining respectability by supporting research.
The Cancer Research Campaign, which gives pounds 47m of scientific grants a year, has said it will not give funds to organisations that accept money from the tobacco industry.
The charity has drawn up a draft code of practice that would require organisations accepting its grants to guarantee they would not take tobacco cash. Professor Gordon McVie, the charity's director-general, said he hoped other grant-giving bodies would join the move to squeeze the tobacco companies out.
He said: "I feel the momentum is in the right direction. We have got to use our influence in as wide a fashion as possible to ensure others will follow."
The charity declared its intention to ban grant recipients from accepting tobacco cash last year after it emerged that Cambridge University, which receives around pounds 2m from the campaign, had accepted a donation of pounds 1.5m from British American Tobacco to establish a chair in international relations. Professor McVie said then that he was "bitterly disappointed" at the university's decision.
An unanswered question is how widely the prohibition would apply. Professor McVie said the target departments would be biology, medicine and biochemistry, but he hoped this list would grow. Some universities were already "clean" of tobacco money, such as Nottingham, but others, such as Bristol, were built on it.
A spokesman for the Tobacco Manufacturers' Association said the industry had a long history of sponsorship which was not dependent on commercial advantage. "If you are making profits from selling a legitimate product and want to give something back to the community you should allowed to do so. It is sad that some people with a special interest want to deny others the benefit of that generosity," he said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments