Attack on ministers' advisers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE WAY ministers appoint special advisers came under attack from an employment tribunal yesterday when it accused the Lord Chancellor of indirect sex discrimination.
The written judgement given by Croydon employment tribunal confirmed that Lord Irvine of Lairg's appointment of Garry Hart as his special adviser was in breach of sex and race discrimination laws. Finding in favour of solicitor Jane Coker, who had hoped to be appointed, the tribunal saidLord Irvine had also breached European law.
Ms Coker said: "The Lord Chancellor must resign in light of today's decision ... the pounds 2.6m a year the Government spends on employing its mates must be repaid to the taxpayer."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments