Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Army firing squads killed boy soldiers

Steve Boggan
Tuesday 27 May 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

At least five of the 307 British soldiers sentenced to death during the First World War were under age but were still executed by army firing squads, it emerged yesterday.

As the Government came under increasing pressure to grant a blanket pardon to the men - many of whom are now believed to have been suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder - details came to light of how the boys met their death.

Records suppressed for 75 years show that three of the 307 were just 17 when they were shot for desertion. The records of a further 85 men do not show their ages, adding to the uncertainty over the fairness of their courts martial.

As reported in yesterday's Independent, John Reid, Minister for the Armed Forces, is reviewing the case for a pardon following the success of a campaign by Andrew Mackinlay, Labour MP for Thurrock, who believes most of those put to death were little more than confused, frightened young men.

Research by another campaigner, war veteran John Hipkin, 72, shows that the three boy soldiers who were shot at 17 - in contravention of the 1879 British Army Act - were Herbert Burden of the Northumberland Fusiliers, Joseph Byers of the Royal Scots Fusiliers, and Herbert Morris, who had travelled from Jamaica with the British West Indies Regiment.

Two others - William Hunter of the Loyal N Lancashire Regiment, and James Crozier of the Royal Irish Rifles - were shot at 18 but it is believed their offences were committed when they were 17. In any case, no one under the age of 19 should have been serving overseas at the time. Burden was just 17 years and 3 months when he was executed for desertion. At his court martial, there was no-one to speak for him because his battalion had been so decimated that all his friends and colleagues were dead, in hospital or transferred to other units.

Byers, the first under-age soldier to be shot in the war, enlisted on 20 November 1914, was shipped to France on 5 December 1914 after two weeks' basic training and was executed for desertion on 6 February 1915.

Hunter had run away at 17 after falling in love with a French girl. At his court martial, Lt Gen Henry Wilson recommended mercy but he was overruled. Wilson later became an MP and was executed by the IRA.

Crozier was recruited at 16 by an officer, Lt Col Frank Crozier, who was amused at finding a would-be recruit sharing his name. He promised Crozier's mother that he would look after her son. However, Lt Crozier later signed the boy's death warrant for desertion.

"These were just boys and the Army knew it, but they just wanted to make an example of deserters," said Mr Hipkin, whose own father lied about his age in order to fight. "God only knows how they could look into the face of a boy and sentence him to death."

The historian Julian Putkow-ski, co-author of Shot at Dawn, said: "I believe there were probably many more boys who were executed. Many lied about their ages and even their names, but none of them should have been there before the age of 19. What is more disturbing is that in some of these cases, the records show that the officers knew the men they were sentencing to death were too young and should simply have been sent home."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in