Cleared Olympic sprinter Erriyon Knighton's doping contamination case headed to appeal
The doping case involving U.S. sprinter Erriyon Knighton’s claims of eating contaminated meat is being appealed and will be sent to the Court of Arbitration for Sport
Cleared Olympic sprinter Erriyon Knighton's doping contamination case headed to appeal
Show all 2Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
The doping case involving U.S. sprinter Erriyon Knighton's claims of eating contaminated meat is being appealed and will be sent to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
The Athletics Integrity Unit, which polices anti-doping on a global level for track and field, announced Wednesday it was appealing the “no-fault” finding issued by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency before this summer's Olympic trials.
Knighton tested positive for a banned drug Trenbolone, which is often found in livestock and has been linked to a number of contamination cases over the years. Knighton said he ate oxtail from a bakery in central Florida that was contaminated.
After Knighton was cleared by USADA, he qualified for the 200 meters at Olympic trials, then finished fourth in Paris. He did not compete on the relay teams.
An independent arbitration panel issued the no-fault decision after reviewing results from tests conducted by USADA from the same shipment of that meat to the bakery where Knighton bought it. The panel concluded the meat could have caused the trace amount of the drug — an amount that still results in a positive test — to show up in Knighton's system.
The AIU did not disclose details of why it was appealing the case.
USADA released a statement from CEO Travis Tygart explaining its handling of the case.
“We understand the AIU’s reasons for appealing this case, as we assume they are the same reasons for which we charged and prosecuted the case,” Tygart said.
USADA and the World Anti-Doping Agency have been sparring over the way contamination cases are handled in the wake of the case involving Chinese swimmers who were cleared to keep competing despite testing positive for a banned heart medication.
Chinese authorities determined the positive tests were results of contamination, but WADA has been criticized because no public announcement was made and the details of the case were not revealed until reporting by The New York Times and German broadcaster ARD exposed details of the case.
___
AP Summer Olympics: https://apnews.com/hub/2024-paris-olympic-games
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.