Answer crystallises after 23 years
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
A professor yesterday told how it took him 23 years to do a numerical calculation that "is of no use whatsoever".
Les Woodcock, physical chemistry professor at the University of Bradford recently completed the mammoth sum to find out whether one form of crystal was more stable than another but said that it was "a long and tedious calculation".
He cheerfully admitted the discovery, which shows the crystal structure of a hexagonal close packed lattice is less stable than a crystal face centred cubic lattice, came about because he had been thinking about it for rather a long time. And he added: "It is not fashionable in UK universities to want to do something for purely academic reasons, for curiosity. It was my personal hobby horse."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments