Answer crystallises after 23 years
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A professor yesterday told how it took him 23 years to do a numerical calculation that "is of no use whatsoever".
Les Woodcock, physical chemistry professor at the University of Bradford recently completed the mammoth sum to find out whether one form of crystal was more stable than another but said that it was "a long and tedious calculation".
He cheerfully admitted the discovery, which shows the crystal structure of a hexagonal close packed lattice is less stable than a crystal face centred cubic lattice, came about because he had been thinking about it for rather a long time. And he added: "It is not fashionable in UK universities to want to do something for purely academic reasons, for curiosity. It was my personal hobby horse."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments