Anger at report on water services
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JAMES CUSICK
After a summer of drought, and amid a deluge of complaints, Britain's water industry regulator Ofwat yesterday angered a consumer group with the claim that "water companies continue to improve customer service".
In the week that saw drought-hit Yorkshire Water resort to a pounds 2m per week tanker operation to ferry water from Northumberland, the message contained in Ofwat's report, 1994-95 Levels of Service, was branded "severely insensitive" by watchdog body Yorkshire Water Watch.
The report details the performance of the 30 water companies in England and Wales, and states that in dealing with billing queries and written complaints, there have been improvements.
Ian Byatt, the Director General of Water Services, reports that where performance, against one or more measure, falls short of what customers can reasonably expect, he "will be discussing with the companies concerned - Mid Kent and Yorkshire - their plans for improvement".
Despite the threat of water cuts, Yorkshire Water scores two "very goods" in the report's analysis of its ability to respond to billing queries and in responding to written complaints.
Diana Scott, one of the leading activists of Yorkshire Water Watch, said: "This whole report shows the insensitivity and lack of real power of Ofwat. What is the point of praising the response time of written complaints if the answers they contain mention nothing about what the companies will now do about leaking pipes, poor investment, or stresses suffered by customers."
In yesterday's report, two companies, south Staffordshire and York, received the top classification for the second year running.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments