Anger at reforms to civil service
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government was accused last night of showing "contempt" for the House of Lords in pressing ahead with privatisation of Civil Service recruitment services against the peers' wishes.
In March the Government was defeated when the Lords backed, by 124 votes to 64, a call to delay the proposed sell-off.
But the Commons last month voted, by a majority of 75, to welcome privatisation of the Recruitment and Assessment Services.
The issue is being examined by a Lords Select Committee.
The Labour peers' leader, Lord Richard, condemned the Government's tactics as "disingenuous and, frankly, treating this House with contempt".
He demanded the privatisation be delayed until the Lords committee had reported and the House debated its report. Instead the Government was drawing up a short list of three potential contractors, Lord Richard protested.
"How with one breath the Government do that and with the other breath say they will consider the recommendations of the committee with care and respond in due course is, frankly, beyond me."
Lord Harris of Greenwich (Lib Dem), accused ministers of treating the select committee in an "extraordinary way".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments