Ancient surgical tools found
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.New archaeological evidence suggests that British doctors were carrying out sophisticated surgical operations 2,000 years ago.
Excavations in Colchester, Essex, and detailed research at the British Museum have identified a unique set of 13 surgical instruments which appear to have belonged to the personal doctor of a native British prince in the mid first-century AD.
The discovery - made by Colchester Archaeological Trust - is unique in that it is the first time anywhere in Europe that archaeologists have found a set of ancient surgical instruments that are not of Roman manufacture.
The items - three giant needles, two scalpels, a surgical saw, a pair of tweezers, two double ended hooks, a pair of forceps, a spoon-like probe, an anchor-shaped hook and another tool - are Roman in concept, but not in their detailed design.
Roman surgical instruments were typically composite objects made of iron and bronze, whereas most of these items are made from pieces of iron. What is more, the blade shape and other design features are different from normal Roman examples.
The instruments appear to be native British made and probably represent a merging of Roman and Celtic surgical traditions. They were probably manufactured around the time of the Roman conquest of Britain, or shortly before,
Until the first century AD, Celtic and classical surgical traditions flourished independently of each other in northern and southern Europe. The northern European tradition went back to at least 2,500BC when cranial operations were carried out with flint surgical equipment.
The Colchester surgical kit was found in a grave belonging to a senior member of the retinue of a leading local royal. The surgeon, who died around AD50, was buried in traditional native fashion. Also found in his grave was soothsaying equipment.The finds have gone on public display at Colchester Museum.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments