Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Allies allowed Swiss to keep Nazi gold loot

Documents reveal British knew of German assets, writes Louise Jury

Louise Jury
Tuesday 10 September 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It was Mr Hirs of the Swiss National Bank who gave the first hint of the Nazi-looted riches in the vaults of Switzerland.

In talks at the end of the war, he and the Swiss delegation denied accepting any tainted gold. But when Mr Vaidie, the French delegate, produced documents showing how the Reichsbank melted down Belgian gold, changed numbers on ingots and shipped most of it to Switzerland, Mr Hirs was rattled.

In his consternation that the Allies really might lay claim to all the wealth which had landed in his safe-keeping from Germany, he let slip how much was at stake - $500m, worth perhaps $6.5bn (pounds 4.3bn) today and twice the amount of gold reserves Germany might have owned legitimately. US estimate of Nazi stocks at the time were about $200m, yet only $60m (Sfr250m) was ever handed over by Switzerland.

As shown in the documents released by the Government yesterday, the US, Britain and France had to accept they had "struck the best deal possible ... Sfr250m was a lot better than nothing". And as the Treasury said in response to complaints by Czechoslovakia that the Swiss were let off lightly, "no arguments of Allied rights could move the unalterable attitude of the Swiss that there was no legal basis which they would admit as conveying an Allied right to German assets in Switzerland".

It was not a view shared since. There are many points of contention, not least that Britain was too concerned about its post-war trading position to pursue neutral countries properly (Portugal, Sweden and Spain all dealt with smaller Nazi hoards). The Americans wanted to threaten sanctions if the neutral countries would not co-operate.

More seriously, Greville Janner and his colleagues at the Holocaust Educational Trust and World Jewish Congress are angry that the Allies decided it would be impossible to trace what proportion of the gold processed through Switzerland came from private individuals.

The Tripartite [Allies] Gold Commission, set up to regain the looted gold, dealt with national gold reserves, not individual wealth. It aimed at excluding any private claims for restitution because the total number might have run into "many thousands".

Yet, Mr Janner believes, among the German ingots which found their way to Switzerland must have been those made from jewellery belonging to Jews and fillings extracted from concentration-camp inmates.

It was known that not all the German gold could be accounted for legitimately. Bank of England intelligence showed that by March 1943 Germany had already sold more gold than it had possessed in 1939. As the Foreign Office report highlighted yesterday: "Any further purchases must necessarily have been made with looted gold."

In producing its memorandum yesterday the Foreign Office said all the information in it had been available in public archives since 1972. But only six weeks ago Malcolm Rifkind, the Foreign Secretary, made no mention of it when replying to earlier inquiries by Mr Janner.

Many questions remain unanswered, such as whether any of the gold and other valuables stolen from individuals ended up in the Tripartite Gold Commission funds.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in