Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Aitken tackles question of resignation

Tim Kelsey
Thursday 15 June 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TIM KELSEY

Jonathan Aitken, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, said last night that he would consider resigning if it was established BMARC, the arms company of which he was once a non-executive director, had shipped weapons to Iran.

Speaking during BBC TV's Question Time, Mr Aitken repeated his denials that he had any knowledge of any illegal shipments after becoming a director in 1989. He insisted the "key thing" was not whether BMARC had exported the weapons but whether he, as a non- executive director, should be held responsible when he said he had no knowledge of it.

"A non-executive director is really only as good as the information he is give," he said, adding he was not told naval guns sent to Singapore were possibly destined, as Michael Heseltine suggested in his Commons statement earlier this week, to Iran.

Asked by a member of the audience whether he felt a minister should stand aside as a matter of honour while a company with which he was associated is investigated he said no. "

Mr Aitken asserted that the Trade and Industry select committee, which is considering whether to open an inquiry, would have access to "all information" concerning the contract - indicating this would include access to confidential intelligence reports on BMARC.

On Monday, Mr Aitken faces a full Opposition Day debate in the Commons.

Inside Parliament, page 8

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in