Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Air traffic debacle delaying flights

It was meant to be the state-of-the-art answer to Britain's overcrowded skies. Randeep Ramesh, Transport Correspondent, explains why the UK's pounds 350m new air traffic control centre is still not up and running and may not be operational until the end of the decade, more than three years late.

Randeep Ramesh
Wednesday 24 September 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

With air traffic increasing by 5 per cent a year in Britain and airlines increasingly concerned about punctuality, carriers will tomorrow voice their worries to the head of the National Air Traffic Service, Bill Semple.

Mr Semple, it is understood, will tell the airlines that the new Swanwick centre, built in Hampshire, will be operational by the end of 1999. This is unlikely to please the carriers, who were expecting the new system to handle "at least 40 per cent more airspace capacity in the mid to late 1990s".

According to Computer Weekly, the British Air Transport Association (Bata), the airline's trade association, wrote last month asking for a refund of the contributions made by airlines to the centre since 1994. Industry estimates put the cost of the extra charges - which cover the depreciation costs associated with the building - to top pounds 30m.

"Airlines are paying 2.5 per cent more than they normally would have for a service that is not being delivered," said Howard Davies, secretary general of Bata.

The problem for the National Air Traffic Service (Nats) is that the world's most advanced air-traffic control centre has been grounded - because of errors in the computer system. The errors are on such a large scale that the problem is unlikely to be resolved in the near future.

What has surprised experts is that the company that won the lucrative contract for Swanwick - the American giant Lockheed Martin - also secured a pounds 230m deal to build the Scottish air traffic centre in Prestwick.

Mr Davies says that the airlines are also considering asking the National Audit Office to probe the Swanwick deal. "We would like to know whether the contractor can be penalised for this level of service," he said. The Commons transport select committee will also investigate the "Swanwick affair" when Parliament reconvenes next month.

British Airways has made "representations" to Nats concerning the non- service from Swanwick. " We eagerly await Nats' proposals in order to resolve the issue. Clearly it affects punctuality - which is important for many passengers." In March, only 37 per cent of BA's Gatwick to Miami flights ran to time; on the Heathrow-Los Angeles service more than 40 per cent of planes left late.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in