Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Advisers split on paying for aid

Glenda Cooper Social Affairs Correspondent
Tuesday 15 December 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE ROYAL Commission to advise how the increasing burden of care for the elderly should be financed is facing worrying divisions, according to sources.

Government officials think that there will be a "substantial minority report" or at least a "strong note of dissent" in the commission's report to the Government, which has already been postponed for publication by a month, to 27 January.

Most of the 12 commission members want to put forward the radical proposal that nursing and personal care costs for the old would be free, in the same way as hospital care. This means that when people enter care homes they would only have to pay for their accommodation, reducing the chances that they would be forced to sell the family home to finance their care.

But a minority on the commission believes that the cost would be far too high. They say those who would gain the most from the system would be the better off, because the poorest are already covered by the means- test system.

A spokesman for the commission said yesterday the differences of opinion were "not unworkable".

The commission, which met as recently as Friday, was set up in December last year by Frank Dobson, the Secretary of State for Health, to find a "fair and affordable" way of funding long-term care.

Under the current means-tested system, which is highly unpopular, people with savings of less than pounds 10,000 have their nursing-home fees paid by the state. Those with savings of up to pounds 16,000 have to pay for part of the fees while those with higher savings pay the full cost. This has led to many elderly people being forced to sell their homes.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in