A whisky by any other name
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An independent distiller's clear spirit may be made from Scotch and taste like a good whisky, but it cannot call itself by the name, a High Court judge ruled yesterday. United Distillers and Allied Domecq - two of the world's biggest drinks firms - won an undertaking from the Isle of Man producers of Glen Kella not to label it as Manx Whiskey in the United Kingdom.
Mr Justice Rattee decided that even though the product is originally Scotch Whisky which is redistilled to remove the yellow colouration, it cannot be called a whisky because it does not comply with the legal definition of the drink. He said "the essential point" was that to call itself whisky it must have been matured after distillation for at least three years and this spirit had not.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments