Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

A chorus of disapproval for English curriculum

Colin Hughes,Education Editor
Thursday 15 April 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A revised English curriculum that sets specific targets for 'correct' standard English and a list of recommended literature, was met by a barrage of professional protest yesterday.

The new curriculum will also oblige infant teachers to include phonics - the use of letter sounds to work out words - in the range of methods they use to teach reading.

John Patten, Secretary of State for Education, said the new proposals would 'simplify, streamline and strengthen the present curriculum by defining clearly the essential skills which English teaching should promote'. The list of classics would ensure that all pupils are introduced to the literary heritage in English.

But critics said the proposals would further damage teachers' morale, and encourage dull grammar lessons.

The National Association for the Teaching of English said that the row over testing made it 'a wholly inappropriate time to be producing a document which will bring yet more disagreement, dismay and disarray'. The new curriculum would lower standards.

Nigel de Gruchy, general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers, said: 'When will this nightmare end? Even Stalin did not force 'standard Russian' down his subjects' throats.'

Anne Taylor, Labour's education spokeswoman, said: 'The Secretary of State cannot resist any opportunity to interfere. It is not his job to prescribe a reading list for schoolchildren.'

David Pascall, outgoing chairman of the National Curriculum Council, said English was the most important subject in the national curriculum because it was fundamental to all learning and to success beyond school.

Standard English will have to be taught from the age of five, but not in traditional grammar lessons. Targets are set for learning spelling and punctuation all the way to 16 - which English teachers reject as too prescriptive.

For primary children, the reading lists are merely recommended. Secondary teachers will have to choose some texts from a large range of options, including at least one Shakespeare play for all children aged 11 to 14.

Sir Ron Dearing, chairman of the testing and curriculum authorities, will oversee three months of consultation. Mr Patten wants to introduce the curriculum in September 1994.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in