Questions of cash: NatWest wasn’t co-operative as we tried to shut accounts

 

Paul Gosling
Friday 01 November 2013 19:14 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Q: We decided earlier this year to close our accounts with NatWest and transfer to the Co-operative Bank to reduce bank charges. We completed the relevant switching request to close and transfer accounts. What should have been simple has been anything but. After a month, one of our accounts had been closed and transferred, but the other four remained open despite us writing to chase them up. We then lodged a complaint with NatWest, but despite having a conversation with our allocated case officer, the other accounts are still not closed. NatWest’s official complaints procedure states that we are supposed to be notified weekly of progress, but this has not happened. Our local branch is appalled at our treatment and has done the best it can but it has no control over account closures. Weeks later, three of our accounts still remain open. LM, Brighton.

A: All the NatWest accounts have now been closed. A spokeswoman for RBS/NatWest says: “Unfortunately, the details required to close [the reader’s] account were taken down inaccurately in the first instance. This led to a delay in processing the request. However all the accounts have now been closed and [the reader] has been refunded for costs incurred as a result of the delay.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in