Treasury won't name and shame tax avoiders

 

Simon Read
Saturday 28 July 2012 00:27 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tax experts have scoffed at Treasury plans announced this week to “name and shame” tax avoiders. But they warned anyone involved in schemes that they face up to five years of sleepless nights as loopholes are closed.

Mitch Young, tax manager at Lerman Jacobs Davis chartered accountants in Elstree, said: “The Treasury believes it has to act, which is why it has re-emphasised its promise to crack down on tax avoidance. However, rumours of naming and shaming are unfounded as HMRC cannot release information on private individuals’ tax affairs.

“The new measures will undoubtedly help HMRC identify those taking part in such schemes and enquiries will increase as a result, but these will go on for a number of years before a conclusion has been reached.”

Frank Nash, tax partner at national accountants Blick Rothenberg, agreed. “While naming and shaming could come in as part of the general anti-avoidance rules due next April, it is likely to be aimed at advisers who promote the schemes which, frankly have a fairly elastic interpretation of the existing tax legislation.

“However, the Revenue does seem determined to crack down on those using artificial tax planning or loopholes – such as the K2 Jersey-based scheme – so I reckon the people involved have up to five years of sleepless nights ahead,” Mr Nash warned.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in