Revenue introduces a shock tax on fund rebates
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Investment groups were caught out this week after a surprise announcement from HM Revenue & Customs that it will tax rebate payments or loyalty bonuses.
These are handouts made by platforms – the online supermarkets of investment funds – to investors, in the form of discounts or extra units in funds.
The move will hit the attractiveness of some platforms while the timing comes 12 months ahead of an expected ban of the payouts by the City watchdog. That would bring the payments in line with the recently introduced ban on commission to advisers.
Alistair Cunningham, of Wingate Financial Planning of Caterham, Surrey, said the timing will lead to confusion. "The announcement on Monday came as a surprise because of the very short timescales – giving the industry less than a fortnight to act," he pointed out.
The Financial Services Authority has been pushing through a move towards so-called "clean" funds, which have transparent charges and no commissions. But the regulator didn't impose the same restrictions on platforms, allowing them to continue to make rebates to investors.
"Our analysis suggested that the cost of many funds was more if we invested in the 'clean' version, rather than the commission-paying version with commission rebated, so we'd kept people in the commission-paying funds," said Mr Cunningham. "The position is now reversed, but causes complications as it may be that switching funds will incur capital-gains tax."
However, Ben Yearsley, head of investment research at Charles Stanley Direct, said: "HMRC's decision will hasten the move towards commission-free, clean-priced funds."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments