Simon Read: Treasury is punishing equitable policyholders again
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The lamentable treatment of Equitable policyholders took another turn for the worse this week. The life company effectively closed in 2001 and policyholders have spent the past 12 years trying to recover some of their cash.
The coalition offered some hope of settlement when it came to power in 2010 but this week the National Audit Office described the Treasury as "disgraceful" for the way it has mishandled the scheme to make payments to former policyholders.
Shockingly the NAO report also shows that with just a year of the government scheme to go, there are still 664,000 payments to be made. Even worse, it's expected that a fifth of policyholders will never be found, and so will never get their money back.
Many payouts will even be received too late, reckons Paul Weir of the Equitable Members' Action Group. "I dread to think how many people have died waiting," he told me. "It's going to be 40,000-50,000 by the time the scheme closes."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments