Simon Read: Travel cover has fallen behind the times
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Which? investigation published today shows that travel insurance policies have failed to move with the times, giving inadequate cover for the full costs of lost or stolen valuables abroad and potentially leaving holidaymakers hundreds of pounds out of pocket.
That's because many travel insurers have not updated policies to include replacement cover for the everyday gadgets that millions now take on holiday, such as smartphones, iPads, iPods and cameras.
Every standard policy Which? looked at had a single item limit for valuables of only £300 or less – less than you'd need to replace any of your portable gadgets.
Which? advises: "To avoid a nasty surprise, travellers should shop around and read the small print or they could find themselves seriously out of pocket."
But it's up to insurers to offer the cover that people need. It's shocking that some policies are now almost worthless. As holidays approach, cover must be made fit for purpose.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments